Legal Opinion

In re G.T.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1992No. 88-FM-965Published

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant, G.T., a mildly retarded adult, seeks to compel the District of Columbia to provide him and his wife, T.B., who also is mentally retarded, with a supervised apartment under the “Mentally Retarded Citizens Constitutional Rights and Dignity Act of 1978,” D.C.Code §§ 6-1901 et seq. (1989) (hereafter “the Act”). The trial court denied appellant’s motion on the ground that, on the particular facts of this case, compelling admission would be inconsistent with the habilitative purposes of the Act. We affirm.

*538I

Appellant has resided intermittently in residential…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BickslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In re WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API