Legal Opinion

People v. Curl

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2009No. S034072PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

Defendant Robert Zane Curl was convicted by a jury of the first degree murder of Richard Urban (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) 1 as to which the jury found that defendant had personally fired one of the shots that caused Urban’s death. The trial court then found true the special circumstance allegation that defendant had been previously convicted of second degree murder. (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(2).) 2 After a court trial, defendant was sentenced to death. This appeal is automatic. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11, subd. (a); § 1239, subd. (b).)

We affirm the judgment.

I. FACTS

A.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. Letner and TobinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. LintonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API