People v. Curl
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Defendant Robert Zane Curl was convicted by a jury of the first degree murder of Richard Urban (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) 1 as to which the jury found that defendant had personally fired one of the shots that caused Urban’s death. The trial court then found true the special circumstance allegation that defendant had been previously convicted of second degree murder. (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(2).) 2 After a court trial, defendant was sentenced to death. This appeal is automatic. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11, subd. (a); § 1239, subd. (b).)
We affirm the judgment.
I. FACTS
A.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. Letner and TobinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. LintonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.