Bacon v. Bronson
New York Court of Chancery
BILL, filed February 16, 1821, stated, that the defendant, Bronson, on the 11th of June, 1818, executed a , bond and mortgage to the plaintiff, to secure the payment of 500 dollars and 76 cents, with interest, on the 1st of December, 1819. The mortgage was of a farm of 175 acres, in Amsterdam, in Montgomery county, and was recorded on the day of its date.
Read the full summary
BILL, filed February 16, 1821, stated, that the defendant, Bronson, on the 11th of June, 1818, executed a , bond and mortgage to the plaintiff, to secure the payment of 500 dollars and 76 cents, with interest, on the 1st of December, 1819. The mortgage was of a farm of 175 acres, in Amsterdam, in Montgomery county, and was recorded on the day of its date. The defendant, Reynolds, an attorney, residing in Amsterdam, prepared the bond and mortgage, and witnessed their execution. The defendant, B., when he gave the mortgage, declared that the premises were unincumbered, except by a judgment,…
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The original and supplemental bills have been taken pro confesso against the defendant, Bronson, and his two children, G. W. J. and P. Bronson, and consequently all the charges of collusion and fraud, in the defendant, B., to cheat the plaintiff out of his mortgage security, are admitted. So, it is also admitted, that the defendants, G. and P. Bronson, possess and enjoy the mortgaged premises, under a contract from the defendant, Marshall, in furtherance of the fraudulent views of the de~ *199fendant, 5., and in consummation of that fraud. It is likewise in proof, that the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Rutherford v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Warner v. DanielsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
- Findley v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Ferson v. SangerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1846
- Graham v. ElmoreMichigan Court of Chancery · 1841
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.