Cowan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtFarmer, J.
Defendant and a companion were arrested for burglary, handcuffed and left unattended in the rear seat of a police car. No one else was present, but a video monitor recorded them.
At trial the prosecution sought to admit excerpts of the recording. The state attorney contended that the companion could be understood as saying to defendant: “Damn, you think they caught us for the home invasion, home burglary?” and “Hey, we did not leave anything in there?” The prosecution argued that defendant’s lips seemed to be moving, that he appeared to say: “They’ve got it. They’ve got it.”1
Defendant…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- State v. KinchenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. HogginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rao v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010