Legal Opinion

Baltimore Luggage Co. v. Samsonite Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 7, 1989No. Civ. PN-86-503PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIEMEYER, District Judge.

This case presents the question whether rulings on trademark issues made by the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) under 19 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1337 are to be given preclusive effect in this litigation under the doctrine of res judicata or collateral estoppel.

When Baltimore Luggage Company introduced a new line of molded luggage, Samsonite contended that the new line infringed Samsonite’s trademark rights. Baltimore Luggage initiated this declaratory judgment action and Samsonite initiated an action before the ITC. With respect to some of the issues that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Corning Glass Works v. United States International Trade Commission, Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd., Sumitomo Electric U.S.A., Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  5. Windsurfing International Inc. v. Amf IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Convertible Rowing Exerciser Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1993
  2. Zeneca Ltd. v. Novopharm Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  3. America Online, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API