Legal Opinion

State v. Byrd

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2009No. 23285PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wolff, Judge.

{¶ 1} Kimberly Byrd appeals from her conviction and sentence in Dayton Municipal Court following a no-contest plea to one count of possessing drug paraphernalia.

{¶ 2} In two related assignments of error, Byrd contends that the trial court erred in overruling her motion to suppress the evidence against her. She claims police illegally detained her when they exceeded the scope and purpose of a traffic stop. She also asserts that a search of her purse was unlawful and that statements she made immediately after the search should have been suppressed.

{¶ 3} The record reflects that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FerranteOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. NaredOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. ArmsteadOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. GlennOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API