123 East Fifty-Fourth Street, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentL. Hand, Circuit Judge
I agree that the defendant cannot invoke § 3443(d). Section 1722 was indeed a general section, when it appeared in the Act of 1924 as § 1000; and since then it has been distributed among various “Chapters” of the Code. However, § 3443(d) is particularly limited to Chapter 29, and a tax on cabarets is not a Manufacturers Excise. I cannot believe that the word, “special,” in § 1722, or in the other places to which § 1000 has been distributed, includes provisions so expressly limited as is § 3443 (d). Besides, § 3443(d) speaks of “articles,” and “purchases” and “vendees,” all of which are not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Williams v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Shearer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Taggart v. KeimCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Ballard Bros. Fish Co. v. StephensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931