Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Civil Service Commission v. Conklin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 16, 1959No. 18146Published

1DissentJustice Doyle

I disagree with the opinion of the majority that the judgment of the district court should be affirmed. I would reverse the judgment of the district court insofar as it operated to void the proceedings before the Commission.

The judgment of the district court operated to “vacate” the order of the commission. In the course of his ruling, the judge gave reasons for vacating:

“ * * * the commission entertained documentary evidence, held conversations out of the presence of the Complainant, or Plaintiff in this case, who under the law was entitled to a fair hearing before the Commission and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Rash v. AllenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
  4. McLaughlin v. Mayor of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. SalardinoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API