Legal Opinion
Adams v. 796-798 Ninth Successor LLC
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 4, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00912Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8/4/2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSHUA ADAMS, Plaintiff, 25-cv-00912 (MKV) -against- ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND AND DENYING 796-798 NINTH SUCCESSOR LLC and THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SOIREE TEA CO LLC, DISMISS AS MOOT Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter motion from Plaintiff, requesting a pre-motion conference regarding her anticipated motion seeking leave to file a second amended complaint. [ECF No. 34]. Defendants oppose Plaintiff’s request because Defendants argue that amendment is futile…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Loreley Financing (Jersey) No. 3 Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Nat'l Credit Union Admin. Bd. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Pettaway v. National Recovery SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.