Pirillo v. Longwood Associates, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*745In this slip and fall case, in order for the plaintiff to make out a prima facie case, he must demonstrate that the defendant Longwood Associates, Inc. (hereinafter Longwood), created the condition which caused the accident or that it had actual or constructive notice of the condition (see, Eddy v Tops Friendly Mkts., 91 AD2d 1203, affd 59 NY2d 692; see also, Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 99 AD2d 246, 249, affd 64 NY2d 670; Trujillo v Riverbay Corp., 153 AD2d 793). There is no evidence that Longwood created the alleged dangerous condition or that it had actual notice of that condition.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Eddy v. Tops Friendly MarketsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eddy v. Tops Friendly MarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Goldman v. Waldbaum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bykofsky v. Waldbaum's Supermarkets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Perlongo v. Park City 3 & 4 Apartments, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Bradish v. Tank Tech Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Batiancela v. Staten Island MallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.