O'Brien v. O'Brien

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony F. Bonadio, J.

The creditor,1 by her attorney, has filed written objections to *160the Hearing Examiner’s order. Unlike most objections, filed against an order of support made in a support or paternity case, this objection relates to an order dismissing the debtor’s mistake of fact, filed in response to the creditor’s income execution for support enforcement (IXSE) and transferring the matter to Supreme Court (see, CPLR 5241; Family Ct Act § 439 [a]; NY Const, art VI, § 19 [e]).

The order is vacated and the matter remanded to the Hearing Examiner for further proceedings…