Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Burlington Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided May 19, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 2245PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NEESE, District Judge.
This is a removed, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), diversity action, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1), for personal injuries and property damages claimed by the plaintiff to have proximately resulted from the defendant’s maintenance of a nuisance on its premises. The jury determined factually, see Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, C.A.Tenn. (1964), 54 Tenn. App. 393, 406(15), 391 S.W.2d 5, certiorari denied (1965), that the defendant maintained a temporary nuisance on its *147premises; that the plaintiff Mrs. Wagner sustained no personal injuries, T.C. A. § 28-304,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail RoadSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Werthan Bag Corp. v. Agnew. Agnew v. Werthan Bag CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Signal Mountain Portland Cement Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dean v. Mitchum-Thayer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978