Legal Opinion

LaChance v. Special Indemnity Fund

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1997No. 88102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

REIF, Judge.

The dispositive question presented is whether the workers’ compensation court can *962award material increase compensation from the Special Indemnity Fund after an employee’s death. This question arose because the employee herein died from cancer before his material increase claim against the Fund could be tried. Employee’s surviving spouse continued prosecution of the claim and was successful in establishing that employee was a previously impaired person who had a 4% material increase in permanent partial disability to the body as a whole from combining his preexisting disability and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olentine v. CallowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Pine, Adm'r v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. O'Neill v. MartoriArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Murch Bros. Construction Co. v. CuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. DuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harjo v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API