Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gail Rosier v. Jeffrey Strobel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 17, 2017No. 15-15091Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

The contract and tort claims alleged by Gail Rosier in this diversity action arise out of the attempts by her ex-husband, Jeffrey Strobel, to collect child support and out of statements made by Strobel in New Hampshire and Arizona state court proceedings. The district court dismissed the complaint, finding the contract claims precluded by a New Hampshire state court judgment and the remaining claims premised on statements for which Strobel enjoys immunity. We affirm.

1. Rosier’s contract claims arise from a child support agreement between her and Strobel. Upon Strobel’s motion, a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ursula Holcombe v. David Hosmer Richard Kirkland, and Dale LiebherrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Provencher v. Buzzell-Plourde AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Gray v. KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. In the Matter of Marcus J. Hampers and Kristin C. HampersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API