Legal Opinion
United States v. John Robert Ragosta
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 23, 1992No. 417, Docket 91-1385PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Circuit Judge:
John Robert Ragosta appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont, Albert W. Coffrin, Judge, after a two-day jury trial in which he was found guilty of one count of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344.
Ragosta argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
On August 15, 1990, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment against Ragosta charging that he
did knowingly execute and attempt to execute a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Nick StavroulakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Donald E. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. James P. LedonneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- United States v. John Lee Molinaro, United States of America v. Donald P. Mangano, Sr., United States of America v. Donald P. Mangano, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.