Legal Opinion

F. v. R.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 29, 1981PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

430 A.2d 1075 (1981)

PETITIONER F., Petitioner Below, Appellant,

v.

RESPONDENT R., Respondent Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted November 13, 1980.

Decided April 29, 1981.

Joel D. Tenenbaum (argued) and Eliot Alazraki of Woloshin & Tenenbaum, P. A., Wilmington, for petitioner below-appellant.

Alene S. Berkowitz (argued) and Garry G. Greenstein of Knecht, Greenstein, Schagrin & Berkowitz, Wilmington, for respondent below-appellee.

Before HERRMANN, C.J., DUFFY and HORSEY, JJ.

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

In this appeal we are required to decide whether a man claiming to be the natural…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Caban v. MohammedSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. P.B.C. v. D.HMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Vincent B. v. Joan R.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Betty J.B. v. Division of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Newmark v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API