Legal Opinion

Re Estate of Banzer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

By agreement of all the parties, three claims, one of Thomas H. Ferrier, one of John Reath and that of the firm of Brunk and Lemley, against the estate of Thomas F. Banzer, deceased, were heard together, both in the probate department of the Circuit Court o.f Multnomah County and in this court on appeal. We glean from the record that Banzer conducted a sawmill in the State of Washington near the town of Yader. Ferrier claims to have *655worked for Banzer in Ms logging and mill operations to a total amount of $1,291.47 upon which he allows credit of $423.80, leaving a balance of $867.67. Heath…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilkes v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Goltra v. PenlandOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Harding v. GrimOregon Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Franklin v. NorthrupOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In Re Estate of TA StollOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. DeWitt v. RissmanOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Tracy v. Pioneer Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lawrence v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API