Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1990No. 01-89-00523-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DUGGAN and HUGHES, JJ., and SMITH *, J. (Retired). DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury found the appellant, Charles Gilmore, guilty of murder, found two enhancement allegations true, and assessed punishment at life imprisonment. In a single point of error, Gilmore complains that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to reopen the evidence after both sides had rested, but before jury argument, during the punishment phase of the trial.

During the punishment phase, the State introduced two penitentiary packets for the purpose of proving the indictment’s two enhancement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Holifield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Granato v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eric John Pedroza v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
  2. Jimmy Darrell Huskey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Jonathan Lee Golatt v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API