Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deutcsh v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 24, 1992No. CR 90-1587Published

1Dissent

In Part II of the majority opinion, the majority concludes that this "conviction must be reversed because the trial judge failed to respond to the confusion expressed by the jury over the question of Deutcsh's legal and criminal liability for the actions of others." I disagree.

After the jury had been deliberating for approximately two hours, the jury returned to the courtroom and the following occurred:

"[FOREMAN]: I don't know what I can ask, or what, because there's been so much statement as to who can say what and how you say it, and everything.
"One of the questions that has arisen is did —…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API