Legal Opinion

1611 Euclid Avenue, Inc. v. Ritter, Ritter & Zaretsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 2008No. 3D07-1633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiffs fifth amended complaint, with prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action. We reverse.

“A legal malpractice action has three elements: 1) the attorney’s employment; 2) the attorney’s neglect of a reasonable duty; and 3) the attorney’s negligence as the proximate cause of loss to the client.” Law Ofc. of David J. Stern, P.A. v. Sec. Nat’l Servicing Corp., 969 So.2d 962, 966 (Fla.2007). The complaint and attached exhibits properly alleged these elements. As such, the dismissal was in error. Accordingly, we remand with instructions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Law Office of Stern v. Security Nat. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spoor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API