Eagan v. City of Buffalo
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendant for a new trial, after a verdict by a jury in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtSears, J.
Some ten years before the accident, out of which this action arises, the city of Buffalo laid a concrete sidewalk, sixty feet in length, in front of two houses known as Nos. 44 and 46 LaForce place. This sidewalk was five or six feet in width, and there was a space of about four and one-half feet between the sidewalk and the line of the adjacent private property, left for a grass plot. The owner of No. 44 LaForce place then constructed a concrete walk running from the entrance to his house to the city sidewalk. This walk, so laid by the property owner, was slightly narrower than the city…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ivory v. . Town of DeerparkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- King v. . Village of Fort AnnNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- McCloskey v. . BuckleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Collett v. MayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Dennis v. Village of Elmira HeightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Croner v. Village of MonticelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Croner v. Village of MonticelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Egan v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919