Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 5, 2001No. 1D99-3969Published

1Opinion

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

The appellee filed a motion for rehearing on June 20, 2001 asserting this court overlooked or misapprehended points of fact and law. We deny the motion.

Although Bay County Ordinance 94-06 provides for a service charge in addition to the amount authorized by the Florida Legislature, the trial court could not require the appellant to pay more than what the legislature has authorized. See Majors v. State, 658 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(holding defendant could not be required to pay a cost which exceeded the amount authorized by statute); Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Majors v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API