Legal Opinion

Robert E. Hatfield v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 30, 1993No. 91-3158PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON REMAND

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us after our judgment, previously reported as Hatfield v. Burlington Northern R. Co., 958 F.2d 320 (10th Cir.1992), was vacated by the Supreme Court and remanded for further consideration in light of CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Easterwood, 507 U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1732, 123 L.Ed.2d 387 (1993). Having reconsidered, we conclude the case must be remanded for further proceedings.

In the original appeal of this case, we held Kansas law did not apply to a grade crossing collision involving Mr. Hatfield because the adoption of the Manual on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Robert E. Hatfield v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Akin v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Earwood v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
  3. Hester v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jason M. Shots v. Csx Transportation, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. In re Miamisburg Train Derailment LitigationOhio Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API