Legal Opinion
Waskey v. Hammer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1910No. Nos. 1,609, 1,595PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The mandate of this court was issued to the District Court for Alaska in the first of the above-entitled cases on June 18, 1909, and in the second case on October 11, 1909. The petitioners now ask this court to recall both mandates, on the ground that in each case the Supreme Court on April 6, 1910, issued its writ of certiorari directing this court to certify its record to that court for its action thereon.
It is a conclusive answer to the petition in the first case to point to the fact that the term at which our mandate issued has long since expired. This court has no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
- Louisville, N. A. & C. Ry. Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1897
- McWilliams v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1866
- Reynolds v. Manhattan Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Willie McCurry v. Marvin Allen and Steven JacobsmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Samson Eisner (Principal) and United Bonding Insurance Co. (Surety)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Sundh Electric Co. v. Cutler-Hammer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- William Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway and Park District of Peoria, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.