Legal Opinion
Meggs v. Best
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided April 22, 1983No. Civ. A. Nos. CV183-36-42 and CV183-43-44PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, District Judge.
Defendant Best has moved for summary judgment in each of the above-styled actions. Having given the pro se plaintiffs in these cases an adequate opportunity to be heard,1 these matters are now ripe for adjudication.2
Summary judgment is appropriate if it appears that “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Rule 56(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. It is clear from the depositions of the plaintiffs and from the remainder of the record that in each of these cases the plaintiffs are suing for an amount of tax…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Leeke v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- DuPont Glore Forgan, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Meggs v. BestCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983