People ex rel. Lord v. Every
Michigan Supreme Court
Information in the nature of quo warranto. Judgment was entered for respondents, and relator brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
An information in the nature of a quo warranto was filed to inquire by virtue of what warrant or right the respondents claim to use, exercise and enjoy the powers, liberties and franchises of a certain school district board. Issue was joined, a trial had in the circuit court and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants, and the case comes here on writ of error. Although *406no finding of facts was requested by either party, yet the court in a very clear and concise manner, in giving judgment, stated the material facts in the case.
It appears that the district in question wras organized May…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Brooks v. FranshamMontana Supreme Court · 1897
- Parks v. State ex rel. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- State ex rel. Fair v. FrazierNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Howell v. ShannonMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- State ex rel. Harris v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.