Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Northcutt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 2007No. 26271Published

1DissentChief Justice Toal

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial court did not err in admitting evidence regarding the victim’s prior leg injury. Furthermore, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the solicitor’s conduct during his closing argument rose to the level of a constitutional violation or otherwise requires reversal.

The relevant jurisprudence instructs that “the Constitution requires the jury to make an individualized determination as to whether the defendant should be executed based on the ‘character of the individual and the circumstances of the crime.’ ” Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API