Legal Opinion

Meade v. Elkhorn Fuel Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 3, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

By this independent action plaintiffs seek a new trial under section 344 of the Civil Code, of an action, the judgment of which was affirmed by this court in Meade, etc. v. Steele Coal Co., 181 Ky. 153, where may be found a full statement of the facts involved.

In the original action no question was made as to the validity of the Chas. Trout patent issued January 24, 1846, under which appellees 'claim title to the 30% acres of land in dispute.

In this action the unly ground asserted for a new trial is the alleged discovery, since the trial, that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Denny v. WickliffeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  2. Meade v. Steele Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Elkhorn Coal Corporation v. HiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Holliday v. Tennis Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Chriswell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. King v. King's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API