Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Bush

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1846PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Motion by the defendant,- for a rule oh the plaintiff, to show cause, why the writ in this cause should not be dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtOrmond, J.

There is no difference in principle, between the facts on which this application is based, and those of Hall y. Hrabrowski, 9 Ala. 278. The petition sets forth, that the plaintiff in error having obtained judgment below, collected the amount thereof by execution, and afterwards prosecuted a writ of error to this court, and at this term of the court has procured a reversal of the judgment. In the case cited, the money was enforced by execution, after the writ of error was sued out, but before the commencement of the term of this court, at which the judgment was reversed ; the application in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hall v. HrabrowskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garner v. PrewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Tarleton v. Goldthwaite's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Ex parte Walter Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. McCreeliss's Distributees v. HinkleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  5. Knox's Distributees v. SteeleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API