Legal Opinion

Reade v. Sullivan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The complaint is insufficient for failure properly to allege damage. The pleading fails to show that defendant would have derived more than $12,000 per annum as profit upon the stock owned by him if he had performed the contract pursuant to its terms. “ In the absence of allegations of fact showing damage, allegations of a breach of contract are not sufficient to sustain a complaint.” (Deutsch v. Textile Waste Merchandising Co., 212 App. Div. 681, 687; Conti v. Cohen, Inc., 197 id. 302.)

In the contract upon which plaintiff relies the only consideration mentioned is one dollar paid by each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deutsch v. Textile Waste Merchandising Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Hope v. . BalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. King v. Union Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. King v. . Union Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Dino De Laurentiis Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Lexington 360 Associates v. First Union National Bank of North CarolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Ryan Ready Mixed Concrete Corp. v. CoonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. Calabria v. Associated Hospital ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. Nyack Waterfront AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API