Legal Opinion

Daniel F. Sullivan v. Frederick R. Carrick

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 12, 1989No. 88-2059PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, Frederick Carrick, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment based on the defenses of absolute and qualified immunity. Our jurisdiction over this appeal is based on the collateral order doctrine of Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982) and Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985).

We describe the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. See Unwin v. Campbell, 863 F.2d 124, 126 (1st Cir.1988). Both Carrick and Daniel Sullivan, the plaintiff, are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Henry H. Amsden v. Thomas F. Moran, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Keenan v. TejedaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Danny M. Bennett v. Dennis Lee HendrixCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Febus-Rodriguez v. Betancourt-LebronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. Royce McLin v. Jason ArdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API