Legal Opinion
Claim of Dishaw v. Midas Service Experts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 16, 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 17, 2004, which ruled that claimant violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits.
Claimant, the manager of an automotive shop, sustained injuries to his head, neck and back in 2001. Following several hearings, his case was established and he began receiving workers’ compensation benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Board, however, ultimately determined that claimant had made material misrepresentations relative to his medical history and, as such, disqualified…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of McCormack v. Eastport Manor ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Bowes v. Gulinello's Town & CountryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Fina v. New York State Olympic Regional Development AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Adams v. Blackhorse Carriers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Claim of Husak v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Robbins v. JerusalemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Donovan v. Boces Rockland CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Hailoo v. State Insurance FundAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.