Legal Opinion
Mid City Bowling Lanes & Sports Palace, Inc. v. Ivercrest, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 10, 1999No. Civil Action 98-2058PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS 1
BERRIGAN, District J.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s IVERCREST, INC. (“Iver-crest”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). Ivercrest contends that it lacks adequate contacts with the state of Louisiana sufficient to justify the exercise of personal jurisdiction by this Court. Having considered the memoranda of counsel, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
A. MID CITY AND TRADEMARK “ROCK ‘N’ BOWL”
Plaintiff MID CITY BOWLING LANES (“Mid City”) operates a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Andy's Music, Inc. v. Andy's Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009