Legal Opinion

Smith v. Great American Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1972No. 46866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant sued to recover on an accident policy issued by defendant, alleging he had suffered the accidental loss of sight of an eye which the policy covered but defendant-insurer had refused to pay the claim thereon.

A trial was had during which the defendant made motions for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case and again at the close of all the evidence. The trial judge denied both motions and submitted the case to the jury. The jury was unable to reach a verdict and a mistrial was declared.

Argued February 7, 1972 Decided February 25, 1972.

Defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cecil Ray Arnold v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Crim v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Arnold v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Cecil Ray Arnold v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Cecil Ray Arnold v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API