Legal Opinion

Karlin v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 14, 1989No. Civ. A. Nos. 88-201-Z, 88-0612-ZPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZOBEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Samuel Karlin and Fayek Bot-ros brought these actions in Massachusetts state court alleging that defendant Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. (“the Company” or “Stone & Webster”) willfully discharged them from its employment and failed to rehire them because of their respective ages and in violation of a collective bargaining agreement between the Company and defendant Local 105 (“the Union”). Stone & Webster removed the case to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (1982). Botros and Karlin seek recovery from the Company under the Age…

2Cases cited6 opinions

United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
John Early v. Eastern TransferCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
William C. ROBINSON, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. POLAROID CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.