Legal Opinion

United States v. Manzp-Jurado

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2006No. 05-30186PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION

BEA, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The disposition filed on June 20, 2006 and available at 452 F.3d 1028, 2006 WL 1679413 is AMENDED as follows. At page 2, note 3 of the opinion, the following sentence shall be deleted in its entirety:

At oral argument, the Government conceded that Manzo-Jurado was seized within the meaning of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), and its progeny, so as to require reasonable suspicion.

At page 2, note 3 of the disposition, the following sentences shall be inserted to replace the deleted sentence:

Manzo-Jur…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. BonvicinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Noe Raygoza-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Bennie Demetrius WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. State v. Hawkins (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Miguel Reynaga Hernandez v. Derrek SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API