Legal Opinion
Hineman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 1973No. 272A76PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Statement on the Appeal
Staton, J.
Scott Hineman was charged by affidavit with unlawfully selling marijuana to Donald Grever. 1 He was tried before a court and found guilty. The overruled motion to correct errors raises these issues on appeal:
A. Sufficiency of the evidence on identification.
B. Exclusion by the trial court of plea bargaining testimony offered by Scott Hineman.
C. Entrapment of the Defendant Scott Hineman.
D. “Improper” sentencing standards used by the trial court.
In our opinion which follows, we examine each of the above issues and find no merit in any of them. We affirm the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lottie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Clemons v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hunter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. HarrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.