Rullman v. Rullman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Doniphan district court; William I. Stuart, judge.
1Per curiam
This is a suit for divorce and alimony. A divorce was refused for the reason that both parties were at fault. The court, however, made a division of property, whereby the, parties might live apart. The defendant, Louis Rullman, prosecutes error, complains that the allowance made to the plaintiff was unreasonably large, and asks that the order be set aside, or at least modified.
It appears from the evidence that the parties were married about twenty-three years before the action was commenced. The plaintiff was about twenty-four years of age and the defendant fifty-nine. At the time of the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917