Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Keleher

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from McDonald Circuit Court. — Hon. Jos. Cravens, Judge. cited Casey v. Clark, 2 Mo. 11; Davis v. M., K. T. Ry. Co., 65 Mo. 441; Brashears v.. Strode, 46 Mo. 221.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

Suit before a justice of the peace ; the complaint as follows: “Plaintiff’ states that on or about the 1st day of October, he contracted with defendant to blast in a well on the premises of the said Michael Keleher, for which the said Keleher was to pay the plaintiff $2 per day. The said plaintiff asks judgment for seven days work, at $2 per day, for which the said plaintiff claims $14. Whereupon plaintiff’ prays judgmeut for $14 for his said debt, and $5 damages.” We think the above contains, though informally drawn, “ a statement of the facts constituting the cause of action,” within the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Razor v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  2. Polhans v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Weese v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API