Legal Opinion

Logan v. D. W. Sivers Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 2006No. C031283CV; A125412PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

This case involves the enforceability of a “nonshop” provision contained in a letter of intent to enter into a final purchase and sale agreement for real property. In the “non-shop” provision, defendant, the seller, promised not to solicit other offers or contract to sell the property to a third party for a period of 60 days. The property at issue was a shopping mall that plaintiff intended to buy as part of a section 1031 exchange 1 to avoid tax liability from her previous sale of a different property. Twenty-one days after the parties executed the letter of intent, defendant entered into a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Tribune Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  2. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cinelli v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998
  4. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Goren v. Royal Investments Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Logan v. D. W. Sivers Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pacificorp v. Northwest Pipeline GPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. Wilcher v. Amerititle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Wilcher v. Amerititle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Logan v. D. W. Sivers Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API