Legal Opinion

People v. Young

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2007No. Docket No. 268227PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMOLENSK, P J.

In this appeal by the prosecution, the sole question before us is whether the trial court articulated a substantial and compelling reason to justify its departure from the sentencing guidelines when sentencing defendant for his jury conviction of armed robbery. Because we conclude that the trial court failed to articulate a substantial and compelling reason for the departure, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand *448this case to the trial court for resentencing. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).

I. STANDARDS OF REVIEW

In reviewing a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MilbournMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. McFarlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. BuehlerMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. YostMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. HornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People of Michigan v. Dawn Marie Dixon-BeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. People v. RoperMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. People v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API