Hendry v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Ronald W. Hendry and a co-defendant were tried by a jury and convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault. Hendry appeals following the denial of his motion for a new trial.
1. Hendry first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine as to identification evidence.
Shortly after the robbery of a convenience store, the employee-victim called the police. He described the incident and the clothing worn by the robbers. Appellant and his companions were apprehended approximately thirty minutes later. The victim was immediately brought to the arrest…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Harper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Ewell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012