In re Deutschmann
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentCohn, J.
The contention of appellant seems to be that in a case such as this where a corporate stock is listed on leading national security exchanges and is actively and freely traded, the current market price should be conclusive evidence of value, regardless of other circumstances, and if this market price coincides with the value fixed by the appraiser and the court, interest must be disallowed, and the court should order an apportionment and assessment of the appraisal costs among respondents. The statute does not so provide.
Market value is, of course, an important factor to be considered where…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. BlumenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- In re MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Calvo v. BartolottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Hearst v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.