Bewley v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
The appellants were charged with the commission of a felony (robbery) while armed. After trial by jury they were convicted as charged, and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years in the Indiana State Reformatory. They filed separate motions for a new trial. Appellant Dul-worth’s sole argument on appeal is that he did not have a speedy trial under the Constitution within the meaning of the two-term statute. Acts 1905, ch. 169 § 219, p. 632, as amended in Acts of 1927, ch. 132, § 12, p. 418, being Burns’ Ind. Stat. Anno. § 9-1402 (1956 Repl.).
It appears that this argument is based upon a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tait v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Hazlett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Finton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Drollinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Fossey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Presley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.