Legal Opinion

Bewley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1966No. 30,531PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.

The appellants were charged with the commission of a felony (robbery) while armed. After trial by jury they were convicted as charged, and sentenced to imprisonment for ten years in the Indiana State Reformatory. They filed separate motions for a new trial. Appellant Dul-worth’s sole argument on appeal is that he did not have a speedy trial under the Constitution within the meaning of the two-term statute. Acts 1905, ch. 169 § 219, p. 632, as amended in Acts of 1927, ch. 132, § 12, p. 418, being Burns’ Ind. Stat. Anno. § 9-1402 (1956 Repl.).

It appears that this argument is based upon a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tait v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hazlett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Finton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Drollinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lawrence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fossey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Presley v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API