Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1974No. 5480PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

RICHARDSON. C.J.

Defendant-appellant Clarence Alan Baker was convicted of three counts of forgery in the second degree. In the indictment the state charged that the appellant:. . . did, with intent to defraud, falsely complete and utter a written instrument, to wit a check . . . thereby commit*622ting the offense of Forgery in the Second Degree in violation of Section 708-852 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes.

However HRS § 708-8521 states in pertinent part:(1) A person commits the offense of forgery in the second degree if, with intent to defraud, he falsely makes, completes,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Territory of Hawaii v. HenryHawaii Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. John K. Lincoln v. Franklin Y.K. SunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. WheelerHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. MitaHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. CadusHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. HughesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API