Legal Opinion

(2010)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided March 8, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Jamie Raskin

You have asked about the law governing executive compensation at Maryland corporations. In particular, you have asked whether payment of excessive executive compensation can constitute a waste of corporate assets. You have also asked whether, in such circumstances, any State official would have standing to initiate aquo warranto action under Annotated Code of Maryland, Corporations Associations Article ("CA"), § 1-403(d) to challenge the payment of such compensation. Finally, you have asked whether the General Assembly could lawfully restrict executive compensation through…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  2. Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass'n, LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Werbowsky v. CollombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API