Mohr v. Tate
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from the chancery court of Pearl River county. HoN. D. M. Russell, Chancellor. ■ • Bill by M. D. Tate1 and wife against L. Mohr & Sons. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Ethridge, J.,
delivered tlie opinion of tlie court.
The appellees, M. D. Tate and wife, filed a "bill in the chancery court to enjoin the execution of a judgment rendered against them in a justice’s court as garnishees, on the ground that the judgment was procured by fraud. It is contended that, when Tate and wife were garnished in said suit, they called the attorney of L. Mohr & Sons over the phone and stated that they were not indebted to the defendant in the judgment, and asked if it would be necessary to appear in court and make answer thereto, and that the attorney stated that, it would…
2Cited by2 opinions
- McCain v. CochranMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
- Moseley v. Southern Colonel Mobile Homes, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979