Legal Opinion

Bingham v. Tuttle

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Madison county court. Action by Mary M. Bingham against Daniel M. Tuttle. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in Madison county, May 8, 1894, for $12,726.70 damages and costs.. The judgment was entered upon an order of the Madison county court confirming the report of a referee appointed by that court to-try the issues and report to the court upon a claim for $12,500,. presented by the plaintiff to the defendant as assignee for the benefit of creditors of E. C. Stark, which was disputed by the assignee. Prior to the time of the assignment, the firm of E. 0. Stark & Co. was composed of Elverton C. Stark and Rinaldo M. Bingham, and was engaged in the business…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Kirby v. SchoonmakerNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
  3. Bank of British North America v. DelafieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Cole v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  5. Hewitt v. . NorthrupNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eckert v. ClarkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  2. Eckert v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API