Legal Opinion

Furst v. Tweed

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1895PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Guthrie District Court. — How. J. H. HeN-DEES0N, Judge. This is a suit in equity for the specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of two hundred and forty acres of land. There was a decree for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKothrock, J.

The defendant is a resident of the state of Ohio, and was the owner of the land in controversy. The plaintiff is a resident of Guthrie county, where the property is situated. The land is fenced for a pasture, but has no other improvements. One O. A. Berry is a real estate agent in Guthrie county, and on the eighteenth day of April, 1892, he entered into a written contract for the sale of the land to the plaintiff. The contract purports to have been made by the defendant, by G. A. Berry, his agent.

*301There are two questions presented by the record. Tlie first is, was the contract an unconditional…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larson v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Balkema v. SearleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Bird v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Crumpacker v. JeffreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Holmes v. RedheadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API