Weinreich v. Sandhaus
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stephen Weinreich (‘Weinreich”) and defendants Richard Sandhaus (“Sandhaus”), Science Faction Corporation (“SFC”) and Dick Sandhaus Productions, Inc. (“DSPI”) (collectively the “Defendants”) have brought various motions concerning the April 28, 1994 Opinion (the “Opinion”) which set forth this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). For the reasons that follow, the Opinion is amended. In all other respects, the parties’ motions are denied. Judgment shall be entered on the complaint in the amount of $89,824.57 with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Knipe v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States ex rel. Familian Northwest, Inc. v. RG & B Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- International Customs Associates, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Safe-Strap Co., Inc. v. Koala Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Troost v. Kitchin (In Re Kitchin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Pits, Ltd. v. American Express Bank InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.